I found this on General Flynn's Parler
(m.theepochtimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Good ideas inside. The weakness of the article is not what the author writes. It is what the author does not write. He argues exclusively from the political point of view. He overlooks the fact that politics is made by money. The money, the central banks, determine the policy. "Follow the Money" is more than a phrase. They own most of the politicians. The higher up these politicians are, the higher the share that the central banks own in them. Besides, the central banks also own the media. As it is, the central banks are in full control. They have been following a plan for decades and this plan is running like on rails. All the more reason for me to agree that the military is the only way. But can we trust the military, of all people? Like the author, I also have considerable doubts about this. Especially since, of all people, Gen. Flynn points to this article. He certainly is a good judge of the inner workings of the military. The author's points 2 through 9 are difficult to realize. However, his point 1 "Face the Reality" is perhaps the most difficult to realize. If he is right, we can wait forever for the knight on the white horse, because he will never come. We all have to get on the horse ourselves. So the critical points for us to think about are: First: "The truth is that Trump was outmaneuvered by an alliance of communists, globalists, and even traitors in his own party. The deep state is now almost fully in control. Let's consider: Mike Pence could not be relied upon, the Supreme Court was a disappointment, and our friend Q is practicing silence. Thanks for that. Second: "The harsh reality is that President Barack Obama had eight years to replace patriotic generals with left-leaning political appointees. He did a great job. If violence breaks out (God forbid) the military will stand with the government, not the insurgents." I don't know the mood or the true loyalty in the military. But certainly I will not put all my eggs in that basket. Especially not as long as the financial market signs that the FED is in total control and the vaccine agenda moves forward.
And Third: "Trump isn't coming back into office any time before 2024-if we still have meaningful elections by then." Why would anyone be able to defeat the Deep State in elections at all after 2020? As it is, they will win every election in the future, even if they get exactly 0% of the vote. So if we are just living in our own illusory reality, we have a real problem and need to completely change our strategy.
I was repeating it from the beginning I am here and I will say it again:
NO. You shouldn't do any big action before Deep State makes real irreversible move like gun grab or forced "vaccination" or taking you from homes. Smaller moves doesn't matter.
Prepare,prepare,prepare. Recognise your tango. Prepare,prepare,prepare - communications and groups ready to go within 24 hours.
Guns stored ? Trap places chosen ? Tango recognised ? We need them to make their moves making them vulnerable enough. Braveheart: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDVuQi4gdtk Were Scotts they not prepared ? Not knowing their targets ? Without good plan ?
"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself"
Q - basing probably on Sun Tzu.
"The object of defense is preservation; and since it is easier to hold ground than to take it, defense is easier than attack. "But defense has a passive purpose: preservation; and attack a positive one: conquest. . . . If defense is the stronger form of war, yet has a negative object, if follows that it should be used only so long as weakness compels, and be abandoned as soon as we are strong enough to pursue a positive object." - von Clausevitz.
So know how strong we are and where - to chose right form.
"Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak. If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him" - Sun Tzu
"For should the enemy strengthen his van, he will weaken his rear; should he strengthen his rear, he will weaken his van; should he strengthen his left, he will weaken his right; should he strengthen his right, he will weaken his left. If he sends reinforcements everywhere, he will everywhere be weak" - Sun Tzu.
You get it ? Have you heard of Second Battle of Zurich - French Massena vs Russian Korsakov ? Let the enemy do few mistakes first.
Ok.So If we know that the only contermeasure deep state CAN if they are in control do is keeping their forces in DC to "not get defeated". However in the meanwhile more and more states can declare they will not obey them like Texas and other states do.We see it. And as the result "fortress" become trap.prison.
The worst thing you can do is attack heavy fortified position in the place enemy wants. Don't come for them when they can try to come for you.