I have to say I don't like the idea of mods banning sources of information unilaterally and without community consent.
Is Evspra now the arbiter of truth on this site?
Shouldn't we be able to decide for ourselves what is true and what is not?
Maybe there should be a community vote before taking site wide actions like this!
If this kind of thing keeps happening, I'll likely move on.... I've seen too many times what happens when a power hungry mod decides to take too much power...
Fair enough, thanks for replying.
I guess I was just taken aback by this move.
I just see the top of the slippery slope like so many other forums, and well I like it here and Don't really want to leave.
Generally I'm happy with your work, it's just banning sites gave me 'nam flashbacks to reddit.
This is a research/information board. A source got scrutinized and was found not only to be lacking, but of having dubious intentions. Brigade the "muh free speech/mods are oppressing me" elsewhere.
Go ahead and keep on surfing at them.
They track the shit out of you (twitter, fb, google analytics + paper.li).
The facebook app id on this website is: 362293833600 https://graph.facebook.com/362293833600
Paper.li is the owner of george.news
I see your point but this is a Q research board and not a "hopium info board". "NO OUTSIDE COMMS"
She? Do you even GAW? ?