1.) The concern isn't exclusively about their location or the business owner's leanings. That is a strawman argument. The real concern is their promotion from a left-leaning group, and the existence of tracking in the design of that host. If they're really concerned about security, they would not be operating a tracker.
Furthermore, do you trust the Swiss government? I sure as hell trust NO governments. Privacy laws mean virtually nothing when a government is immune to them.
2.) Once again, a strawman. George has used these videos in the past as a way of "proving" their legitimacy. "Here are videos that only we have" falls apart when other people have them. By being deceptive about this, not only are they flat out wrong, they are BEING deceptive.
3.) GAW is not claiming to have insider knowledge. They are claiming to promote Q to the public. GN acts mysterious, and plays games, dropping "coded messages" and pretending to have insider information. THAT violates "no outside comms". If someone in GAW were claiming to know Q, or have ties to Q, that would also violate it. They do not.
Nice try but two strawmans and a false equivalency isn't a "nice try" or a "checkmate".
You only addressed half of my arguments and walk away like you won? Ok.
What are you not getting about "Laws are meaningless for corrupt governments"? There are less corrupt governments that make a hell of a lot more sense to trust. The Swiss have been a hub for banking for decades. They're near the bottom of my "trust these countries" list.
When GN claims to be releasing videos that ONLY THEY have, and do not claim association with those other people, the claim of exclusivity does not stand.
1.) The concern isn't exclusively about their location or the business owner's leanings. That is a strawman argument. The real concern is their promotion from a left-leaning group, and the existence of tracking in the design of that host. If they're really concerned about security, they would not be operating a tracker.
Furthermore, do you trust the Swiss government? I sure as hell trust NO governments. Privacy laws mean virtually nothing when a government is immune to them.
2.) Once again, a strawman. George has used these videos in the past as a way of "proving" their legitimacy. "Here are videos that only we have" falls apart when other people have them. By being deceptive about this, not only are they flat out wrong, they are BEING deceptive.
3.) GAW is not claiming to have insider knowledge. They are claiming to promote Q to the public. GN acts mysterious, and plays games, dropping "coded messages" and pretending to have insider information. THAT violates "no outside comms". If someone in GAW were claiming to know Q, or have ties to Q, that would also violate it. They do not.
Nice try but two strawmans and a false equivalency isn't a "nice try" or a "checkmate".
You only addressed half of my arguments and walk away like you won? Ok.
What are you not getting about "Laws are meaningless for corrupt governments"? There are less corrupt governments that make a hell of a lot more sense to trust. The Swiss have been a hub for banking for decades. They're near the bottom of my "trust these countries" list.
When GN claims to be releasing videos that ONLY THEY have, and do not claim association with those other people, the claim of exclusivity does not stand.
You clearly didn't read what I said. Read it through thoroughly and come back with a more nuanced response.