Why would that mean they are suddenly untrustworthy? Anything they are doing online is using up time and energy that they could be using to produce income elsewhere. It is taking time and energy away from job and family. Why shouldn't they make some money at the same time they are giving away information for free? If they were demanding subscription fees before sharing anything, that'd be different.
I keep seeing comments about this that don't seem logical to me. If you don't want to donate or buy a t-shirt, don't. But that has nothing to do with their credibility.
People who report news and are influencers can sell tshirts and have merchandise, but when people claim that they have insider info and then try to earn money, it kinda is suspicious.
But in that case, claiming to have insider info about Q is what damages their credibility, whether they're selling anything or not.
Most Paytriots have no products in exchange for your donation. They have nothing for sale. They just want money for having connections that don’t exist.
....i can think of more people who sell me cry than don't.
Juan 0 Savin Salty cracker Steve turkey Crowded The hedge twins....
Like.
If people don't want to work with corporate (Mostly blue) And if we keep getting deplatformed and demonized..... And If one wants to spread the world in real life...
Why WOULDN'T one sell merch?
Once again...
Free market economy or not?
If you havent read the ENTIRE investigation done by u/Evspra than do not comment on the subject. If you have, than you are either being willfully ignorant or are a shill. They made many claims that the investigation has disproved. I say this all as one of GEORGEnews's biggest fans on here. It is disheartening, but the proof is in the pudding.
I'm not talking about George. I know nothing about that. I'm talking about comments I've seen regarding a number of different people. This George news thing is just the most recent.
Ah, I see.
Isn't it the claim of insider info that did the most damage to George's credibility? Thats a separate issue, in my view.
Using the claim to sell products and harvest donations is as scummy as it gets in my book. You're question is why cant they sell merch. Well if you're using false claims to do it...
Right. Making false claims and selling merch is scummy. Sharing news/opinions without making false claims while also selling merch is not scummy. I dont get why people lump those two groups together.
False claims=bad
Making money= neutral
A wise man once said: "You can not server two masters"
Agreed! Especially since there's nothing that says you HAVE to buy anything from them.
DJT is a capitalist. The real USA is a Constitutional Republic built on a Capitalist free market.
DJT pointed to a person wearing a Q t-shirt. Do you think DJT prints those up? IS there an official website selling these designs? Does Q have an official merch store?
Of course not. Someone took the initiative to make a few bucks. It's part of the game.
As for the sudden attack of George as being "FAKE" and a "PAYTRIOT" -- ask yourself why all of a sudden . . . Ask yourself why so many all of a sudden . . . Ask yourself where was this fervor against Alex Jones and Mike Adams . . . Especially since George hasn't come out and claimed to be Q.
Does George intimate closeness to DJT? YES
Does George intimate awareness of Q? YES
Does George cheerlead for DJT & the military? YES
Does George sell merch? YES
Seriously, I've yet to see any nefarious accusations that would warrant such a coordinated attack.
Almost every organization with any public face sells branded merchandise.
The organization and public face is missing.. Who are they? Can you tell? :-)