Hi, I have a question. I got into a long discussion with my law-student brother who, while very conservative and a Trump voter, is certainly no anon and very by the books. He said to me about Pence’s decision on the 6th that it was his constitutional duty to certify the votes, even though they may have been fraudulent, because the states had given him their already certified votes. In other words, the states came to pence and said, “we elected this guy, we’ve already certified it.” This left Pence, even if he knew the votes were fraudulent, no choice but to push them through because the constitution dictates it so. The VP “shall” certify the votes, notwithstanding the validity of them, since they’ve gotten to that point. Hopefully this makes sense.
What are your thoughts on this?
i believe legally and morally he could have and should have refused to certify. if nothing else there were Patriots suggesting he could have demanded a commission be set up that allowed 10 days or so to assess situations
Yep, we've heard this "but I have to certify them" excuse even before that day and there have been plenty of refutations.
The old "I had to gas the jews, it was my orders" excuse.
I don't buy it. Doing the right thing comes before following your orders.
That's a strange reference knowing what we know about WWII, globalists, the media, and revisionist history. The gas chambers were installed after the war. History is written by the winners.