The only things up there that are implausible are the climate change (it’s always changing that’s not what I’m referring to though), not making friends, many African Americans*.
I think the rest is pretty darn solid. I saw you linked some about the different viruses but I think it’s a pretty ridiculous distinction when you look at the criteria. Maybe you were also looking at what I mentioned about fake pandemic.
Flu = “lots of viruses”
Covid19 = “specific virus”
but this virus’ symptoms and other characterizations are entirely secondary to the invented distinction in PCR testing. All they’ve done is standardized a process where they run enough cycles to guarantee 1) positive results 2) changes in the viral RNA. In scientific settings they actually monitor for abnormalities in COVID19 world they don’t give a flying fuck about contamination or the accuracy of quantification.
Read the collaboration studies on Covid. Read about how the test actually works. How the scan works. How they actually distinguish it merely by partial clones of the reverse chains. Read about the drawbacks to PCR testing. Look at their cycle counts in cdc and who guidance.
And you’re really going to call it deadlier? My shill alarm is ringing. It isn’t any deadlier they simply shifted the numbers around attributing more to COVID. If it were significantly deadlier we’d have... oh I don’t know dead people?
It is deadlier only if you're obese, elderly or have a compromised immune system.
And when it comes to the PCR test, those scientists who decided to push it as the predominant test method don't seem like they seemed to care about accuracy.
Other points are fairly sound ?
I know I'm a toolbag, but I couldn't stop myself from typing and now I've already gotten this far so... whatever
The only things up there that are implausible are the climate change (it’s always changing that’s not what I’m referring to though), not making friends, many African Americans*.
I think the rest is pretty darn solid. I saw you linked some about the different viruses but I think it’s a pretty ridiculous distinction when you look at the criteria. Maybe you were also looking at what I mentioned about fake pandemic.
Flu = “lots of viruses”
Covid19 = “specific virus”
but this virus’ symptoms and other characterizations are entirely secondary to the invented distinction in PCR testing. All they’ve done is standardized a process where they run enough cycles to guarantee 1) positive results 2) changes in the viral RNA. In scientific settings they actually monitor for abnormalities in COVID19 world they don’t give a flying fuck about contamination or the accuracy of quantification.
Read the collaboration studies on Covid. Read about how the test actually works. How the scan works. How they actually distinguish it merely by partial clones of the reverse chains. Read about the drawbacks to PCR testing. Look at their cycle counts in cdc and who guidance.
And you’re really going to call it deadlier? My shill alarm is ringing. It isn’t any deadlier they simply shifted the numbers around attributing more to COVID. If it were significantly deadlier we’d have... oh I don’t know dead people?
It is deadlier only if you're obese, elderly or have a compromised immune system.
And when it comes to the PCR test, those scientists who decided to push it as the predominant test method don't seem like they seemed to care about accuracy.
Other points are fairly sound ?
I know I'm a toolbag, but I couldn't stop myself from typing and now I've already gotten this far so... whatever