https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-green-screen-twitter-white-house-immigration-1576743
Two points to note. They say another angle shows he isn't in front of a green screen but do not provide said angle. Also, an anon states (presumably from twitter) that if it were green screened the mikes would be in front of Biden....????
Because you stand in front of a green screen so that what is behind you shows overtop of you...LOL. How do weathermen work?
I wonder why they think this? From another angle he can still be in front of a green screen, and a different angle on the background displayed.
These are some of the weakest attempts to defend against what's blatantly obvious.
This must be a distraction from the Granny killer and the crisis on the border. I'm moving on.
Definitely a fine move. However, this is indefensible. Anyone resistant to the red pill might need this. I don't think we can let this go. Optics are optics. Trust the science and force people to see it
He’s green screened. Which means there is a green screen always in the back of the shot. The mics are NOT green screened. The grounds, buildings, sky, etc, are NOT green screened. They are using a motion mask in After Effects. This separates them from the grass and other things so Biden can be brought between them. This is why the mics pop behind and in front of his hands.
The reporters, mics, grass, building, sidewalk...all of that is in the same shot. It was all filmed at the same time. Biden is foreign to the shot and was inserted. The mics and reporters were cut out and put on top of Biden.
The process that creates the motion mask hiccuped during export causing the hand mic pop. It happens. You have to go back and then fix that frame and reexport, etc. there was a reason they weren’t able to go back and fix it. Maybe they were doing this live. Stupid, but the simplest explanation.
Look, this is literally the latest and greatest from After Effects. Including camera perspective correction on objects shot with different cameras. Which is to say, it’s probably gonna be hard to explain the specifics to people, but it’s obviously been messed with. I’m confident most people will get that even if they don’t get the specifics.
But every high end video editor that uses After Effects knows what they just saw. Obama’s birth certificate red pilled a lot of graphic professionals because it was an obvious forgery. This will do the same.
I just came out of an intense After Effects training course. Please spread my explanation. It’s what they did.
Please share Anons. Here is a video showing some of what they did. After watching this silly little tutorial you’ll get everything I just said. https://youtu.be/N27sFnZ6284
The other angle this fake news outlet referenced is the one we all already saw, the one where he brushed his right hand over the mic on the side. Debunked my ass.
I think you are right, which is why they keep it vague. For many being told another angle exists and debunked will be enough. Some will see the second angle and assume they were referencing a third angle. We can't let this go. People's eyes can be made to see with this. It is what it is
They didn't keep it vague. They are outright lying here: https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-joe-biden-video-green-screen-1576899
I say vague because their refutation is not conclusive. You are right. It is clearly wrong. Funny how the article you linked is nearly identical in content to the one I posted. Saw a video using the exact same language and quotes in different combos. It's so weak. Stopping this may require us to spread the truth
I guess they are catering to the really dumb ...
Those comments in the newsweek article are golden haha
I'm not disputing what you say. The article suggests green screens are always in front of the actual image. i.e This is not a green screen because Biden is in front the mikes. I say he's in front of a green screen and goes overtop the mikes. What you say doesn't refute this. Do you agree or disagree?
Cool. The other possibility I see is exactly what you suggest. I believe it is one of the two. I think we are watching a show meant to wake people up. Another group of people said hold the phone this is nonsense. That is why I think we should spread this
The fact that Newsweek is even attempting a deboonk means they are worried about something.