the-game, I totally understand your argument. Alex Jones is very useful as he incites the so called “Streisand effect”; but, he then usually “denies” or questions the so-called conspiracies. Furthermore, he is a highly theatrical caricature who will never be taken “seriously” by normies or lame stream. He serves a purpose; he incites then placates the conspiracy theorists. I feel he is controlled. He “knows” what critical thinkers are going to figure out, gets ahead of them, blasts it on his platform, and then debunks. Like Q said, be careful who you follow. This is just my humble opinion. GODSPEED
the-game, I totally understand your argument. Alex Jones is very useful as he incites the so called “Streisand effect”; but, he then usually “denies” or questions the so-called conspiracies. Furthermore, he is a highly theatrical caricature who will never be taken “seriously” by normies or lame stream. He serves a purpose; he incites then placates the conspiracy theorists. I feel he is controlled. He “knows” what critical thinkers are going to figure out, gets ahead of them, blasts it on his platform, and then debunks. Like Q said, be careful who you follow. This is just my humble opinion. GODSPEED