Anybody else see what I see in this screenshot from Bill Murray's golf clothes site?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
Ok, am I the only one that thinks that not every single instance of a symbol that I’m willing to bet most of us probably doodled in class at one time means that person is a pedo? serious question, how much input does a person “designing” a line of clothes with a company have? Could it be possible that someone else made that print and he just glossed through a catologue and picked random ones that he liked for his stuff?
I used to think like that, so I get where you’re coming from. However, think about how much money and fame most fashion designers have nowadays. They are propped up by Hollywood, so it’s not a stretch to think that they are one in the same. Also, sure, some people may have doodled something similar in their life by random chance. However, when the same people making/promoting the doodles also rode the Lolita Express to pedo island...I’m gonna say it goes beyond a random chance at that point.
Those are some good points, thank you. I’m still skeptical about this particular one, idk.
That’s fair and no worries, fren. I think most of us found our way here because we have a healthy dose of skepticism in us. I think it’s always good to maintain some.
Are you new to this? Once you get more familiar with their codes and who they are, how they are connected, what other codes you've seen and heard from them, what used to seem like, "Oh, it could be innocent" will start to seem glaring.