I did data analysis for the campaign. Day after the election we noticed anomalies, which I personally dug into within the county/district. Found the anomalies checked out and oversaw the canvassing which yielded a 32% "phantom voter" result.
Dr. Frank came on to validate my findings in early January. Shortly afterward we began looking at Pennsylvania as a whole. I found a few hundred thousand invalid votes just by analyzing the publically available data here. During this period, Dr. Frank made the breakthrough in the data that's featured in this movie.
He found an algorithm at play that was causing the anomalies I had found by looking at the election data.
I've been working with Dr. Frank since January and was very excited when Mike got in touch with our team and wanted to feature Dr. Frank in an hour-long special.
Outstanding! Bless you patriots! I am just now digesting this and WOW!
One question - Ohio went Trump yet that is the initial state he is talking about. So even though the vote outcome was 'rigged', they let it slide for Trump? So the formula for Ohio was 'less rigged' than it was for the swing states?
Great question! Ohio was the second state that Dr. Frank ran, because that's his home state. He figured "My state handles elections pretty well, and Trump won my home state, let me show how well my state handled this election". In running the same algorithms, he discovered that Trump won Ohio but much larger numbers than were certified.
This actually makes a lot of sense, from what we saw in Pennsylvania on the county-by-county level. If a Red county flips blue overnight, then that's going to raise a lot of suspicions. So the cheating needs to be eased in over the course of years to not draw a lot of attention. This has been happening in counties around Philadelphia for years now, and many people just "accept" that those surrounding counties are now solidly Democrat just like Philadelphia.
Yes and they actually addressed my question later in the video.
So what this is telling me that my theory they just focused on a few key counties in key swing states is incorrect. They were manipulating numbers all over the place.
Is Dr. Frank in touch with AZ or have any interest in Maricopa County AZ? I would think that given the audit going forward there and since they just announced the team that will be doing the audit, there might be the opportunity to compare notes.
How did you personally work on it...!?
I did data analysis for the campaign. Day after the election we noticed anomalies, which I personally dug into within the county/district. Found the anomalies checked out and oversaw the canvassing which yielded a 32% "phantom voter" result.
Dr. Frank came on to validate my findings in early January. Shortly afterward we began looking at Pennsylvania as a whole. I found a few hundred thousand invalid votes just by analyzing the publically available data here. During this period, Dr. Frank made the breakthrough in the data that's featured in this movie.
He found an algorithm at play that was causing the anomalies I had found by looking at the election data.
I've been working with Dr. Frank since January and was very excited when Mike got in touch with our team and wanted to feature Dr. Frank in an hour-long special.
Outstanding! Bless you patriots! I am just now digesting this and WOW!
One question - Ohio went Trump yet that is the initial state he is talking about. So even though the vote outcome was 'rigged', they let it slide for Trump? So the formula for Ohio was 'less rigged' than it was for the swing states?
Great question! Ohio was the second state that Dr. Frank ran, because that's his home state. He figured "My state handles elections pretty well, and Trump won my home state, let me show how well my state handled this election". In running the same algorithms, he discovered that Trump won Ohio but much larger numbers than were certified.
This actually makes a lot of sense, from what we saw in Pennsylvania on the county-by-county level. If a Red county flips blue overnight, then that's going to raise a lot of suspicions. So the cheating needs to be eased in over the course of years to not draw a lot of attention. This has been happening in counties around Philadelphia for years now, and many people just "accept" that those surrounding counties are now solidly Democrat just like Philadelphia.
I hope that explanation makes sense
Yes and they actually addressed my question later in the video.
So what this is telling me that my theory they just focused on a few key counties in key swing states is incorrect. They were manipulating numbers all over the place.
Is Dr. Frank in touch with AZ or have any interest in Maricopa County AZ? I would think that given the audit going forward there and since they just announced the team that will be doing the audit, there might be the opportunity to compare notes.
Interesting.