@Brioux Thanks a bunch for being available for questions. I have a few:
The red lines in the graphs represent the number of ballots for each distinct age in years. How are these data obtained? Is it perhaps from the exact same table as the number of registrations (the black lines), but subsetted to the rows marked as having voted on Nov 3, 2020?
In how many states was this analysis done?
In the states that were analyzed, is the claim that votes were manipulated in every county according to the key for that state? Even honest small rural red counties where voting was conducted securely? if so, it should be possible to go back and total up the precincts in such counties and find discrepancies.
Are any of the spreadsheets shown available publicly so that we can check them ourselves?
I'm just happy to have been able to stand up for my Country and use my skillset to help identify and prove the fraud. It's the honor of my lifetime and I hope it makes a difference.
Can you provide a screenshot of the graphic you're referencing? I may be able to give you a better answer with that reference. However, I think I know what you're asking about, which if that's the case, then your assumption is correct. The "red" line that represents the number of ballots for each age group is derived from the registration data based on their having cast a vote on 11/3
I believe Dr. Frank has run his analysis on a half dozen states at this point, but he's aiming to run the analysis on as many states as feasible. Some states have an absurd cost associated with obtaining their voter rolls (EX: California: $15k, Alabama: $37k, Nevada: $20k, Wisconsin: $12.5k). I know with 100% certainty that he's run his analysis on Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, and Florida.
This is actually one of the pretty astounding discoveries that our team made internally in analyzing Pennsylvania. A few things -
A) In Pennsylvania, all counties were forced to update their voting machines in 2019. Governor Wolf unconstitutionally mandated this and provided a list of voting machines for each county to choose from. I tried to raise the alarm at the time but wasn't able to change the outcome. All counties had new machines in place by the 2020 election.
B) A precinct could run a fair election (I believe my precinct did!), however, once the results leave the precinct level there are multiple points of vulnerabilities. The precinct data goes to the county which is then sent to the Department of State.
C) With the addition of mail ballots, the "votes" would circumvent the precincts and go straight to the counties. There's also no verification on the signatures or addresses. I found that thousands of ballots were sent to addresses in Pennsylvania that aren't associated with the voters. Who received those ballots and who sent the ballots back in?
D) Agreed about being able to go back and total up the precincts. Our team has actually found that certain counties still have under/overcounts months after the election that they cannot reconcile. Our SoS (Boockvar) even certified wrong numbers (according to her own DOS values). Further, the registration databases show different numbers and I'm sure if we checked the actual ballots, we'd find a different number still! The issue has been trying to get all this information in front of people who could actually make a difference. SCOTUS won't hear it and we haven't found a court that's interested.
I don't believe so, but Dr. Frank has stated he wants to teach the public how to run this analysis on their own. The voter roll data (for most states) is easy to obtain from your county/state board of elections (generally for a small fee).
I hope I answered all your questions. Thanks for the thoughtful comment!
A key focus of Matt Braynard's lookaheadamerica.org has been obtaining voter rolls and doing the difficult work of finding and verifying illegal entries. The left's largely false and woke screams of voter suppression need to be fully exposed as we continue to work towards truly fair, free, and honest elections.
We need to take every reasonable step possible towards eliminating voter fraud, especially in big cities. I'd like to see even stronger laws that are enforced and ensure true chain-of-custody and verification, e.g. https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRQHTDzE/paper-voting-reform-proposal-/
@Brioux Thanks a bunch for being available for questions. I have a few:
The red lines in the graphs represent the number of ballots for each distinct age in years. How are these data obtained? Is it perhaps from the exact same table as the number of registrations (the black lines), but subsetted to the rows marked as having voted on Nov 3, 2020?
In how many states was this analysis done?
In the states that were analyzed, is the claim that votes were manipulated in every county according to the key for that state? Even honest small rural red counties where voting was conducted securely? if so, it should be possible to go back and total up the precincts in such counties and find discrepancies.
Are any of the spreadsheets shown available publicly so that we can check them ourselves?
I'm just happy to have been able to stand up for my Country and use my skillset to help identify and prove the fraud. It's the honor of my lifetime and I hope it makes a difference.
Can you provide a screenshot of the graphic you're referencing? I may be able to give you a better answer with that reference. However, I think I know what you're asking about, which if that's the case, then your assumption is correct. The "red" line that represents the number of ballots for each age group is derived from the registration data based on their having cast a vote on 11/3
I believe Dr. Frank has run his analysis on a half dozen states at this point, but he's aiming to run the analysis on as many states as feasible. Some states have an absurd cost associated with obtaining their voter rolls (EX: California: $15k, Alabama: $37k, Nevada: $20k, Wisconsin: $12.5k). I know with 100% certainty that he's run his analysis on Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, and Florida.
This is actually one of the pretty astounding discoveries that our team made internally in analyzing Pennsylvania. A few things -
A) In Pennsylvania, all counties were forced to update their voting machines in 2019. Governor Wolf unconstitutionally mandated this and provided a list of voting machines for each county to choose from. I tried to raise the alarm at the time but wasn't able to change the outcome. All counties had new machines in place by the 2020 election.
B) A precinct could run a fair election (I believe my precinct did!), however, once the results leave the precinct level there are multiple points of vulnerabilities. The precinct data goes to the county which is then sent to the Department of State.
C) With the addition of mail ballots, the "votes" would circumvent the precincts and go straight to the counties. There's also no verification on the signatures or addresses. I found that thousands of ballots were sent to addresses in Pennsylvania that aren't associated with the voters. Who received those ballots and who sent the ballots back in?
D) Agreed about being able to go back and total up the precincts. Our team has actually found that certain counties still have under/overcounts months after the election that they cannot reconcile. Our SoS (Boockvar) even certified wrong numbers (according to her own DOS values). Further, the registration databases show different numbers and I'm sure if we checked the actual ballots, we'd find a different number still! The issue has been trying to get all this information in front of people who could actually make a difference. SCOTUS won't hear it and we haven't found a court that's interested.
I don't believe so, but Dr. Frank has stated he wants to teach the public how to run this analysis on their own. The voter roll data (for most states) is easy to obtain from your county/state board of elections (generally for a small fee).
I hope I answered all your questions. Thanks for the thoughtful comment!
A go-fund-me would allow the public an opportunity to contribute to these efforts. Does one exist?
A key focus of Matt Braynard's lookaheadamerica.org has been obtaining voter rolls and doing the difficult work of finding and verifying illegal entries. The left's largely false and woke screams of voter suppression need to be fully exposed as we continue to work towards truly fair, free, and honest elections.
We need to take every reasonable step possible towards eliminating voter fraud, especially in big cities. I'd like to see even stronger laws that are enforced and ensure true chain-of-custody and verification, e.g. https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRQHTDzE/paper-voting-reform-proposal-/
Thanks.