Alex jones calling Q fake kinda freaks me out.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
Not sure. Alex has been correct quite a lot.
My dead clock is right twice every single day. AJ subtly mixes disinformation with stuff that we (most of us here) already know.
He does exactly that. He shocked the hell out of the pizzagate researchers when - as he always does! - crunch time came and he denounced pizzagate completely. He did the same thing with Sandy Hook. That woke a lot of people up. AJ still has a lot of sycophants following him, but at this point they can sink with him. That's their own problem, not ours.
Alex Jones is Mossad owned, controlled, and funded. The Q team told us that years ago.
Now - would a CIA or Mossad (both are Deep State/Cabal) operative know a lot of things? Would they shift narratives to manipulate you? Or would they just be as honest as the day is long? Is there ANY chance a Deep State controlled player would just be sitting there rooting for you and wanting you to know the truth?
Ok here's the problem with your response - You have already trusted Q over AJ by accepting what Q has said about AJ.
If the question is - Why trust Q over AJ, your answer cannot be "because Q said so".
This isn't a decision on who to trust it's simply pointing out that if you want to convince somebody one way or the other you cannot invoke one of the parties in question as the primary reason.
What the hell are you even doing here?
This is a Q research board, not a MOSSAD cheerleading board.
I'm not saying to trust AJ over Q, I'm saying that if a new person looking into Q is asking why Q over AJ, you can't use "Q said so" as a way to convince them. You need something else.