That's all.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I still don't know what the "vaccine" (gene therapy) is intended to accomplish.
Are the people that take the gene therapy at more risk or less risk to other viruses in the future? I have read theories going both ways on that topic.
In my opinion the gene therapy vaccine is unnecessary compared to using vitamin D3, C, etc. to maintain a good immune system, and boosting it with Ivermectin, Quercetin, Zinc, etc. as needed.
But I wonder what exactly is the real purpose of the "vaccine"? To weaken the immune system of those that take it, or create a much deadlier version of the virus that attacks those that have not taken it? Which group is more at risk? Or does it have some other ultimate purpose entirely?
That part is very confusing...
Edit: since it is being pushed by the DS, my bet is that the gene therapy is intended to reduce population numbers, so it is better not to take it... but then we have President Trump saying to get it, and the military also using it... so I am back to having no idea what is going on...
It's designed to sterilize and depopulate, primarily.
The only reason Trump is playing along, is conceivably so that the black hats don't think he is "on to" what's going on with it.
Hmmm - I have a problem with that. If the white hats know the gene therapy will sterilize and "depopulate" (eventually kill) a percentage of the people conned into getting the shot - does that make them complicit? If they said "no, don't get the shot, there are problems with it" they would be in the clear. However, "playing along with it" means sharing some of the responsibility for the damage it does - no?
That is the part that has me confused.