We have copies of what you're reading right now that are more than 2000 years old. Rome had no chance to "editorialize" the Dead Sea Scrolls--and when it comes to the New Testament in particular, they actively suppressed knowledge of what it said for centuries, but there were just too many copies floating around to change it. And I'm not talking about dangerous for others, although you're doing no one any favors by spreading these half-thought-out conjectures. I mean dangerous for you. Don't start from the assumption that corruption you're so quick to point out isn't also in your heart. If you trust your own judgement that implicitly, you'll read anything you want into the text, while completely ignoring what it actually says.
We have copies of what you're reading right now that are more than 2000 years old. Rome had no chance to "editorialize" the Dead Sea Scrolls--and when it comes to the New Testament in particular, they actively suppressed knowledge of what it said for centuries, but there were just too many copies floating around to change it. And I'm not talking about dangerous for others, although you're doing no one any favors by spreading these half-thought-out conjectures. I mean dangerous for you. Don't start from the assumption that corruption you're so quick to point out isn't also in your heart. If you trust your own judgement that implicitly, you'll read anything you want into the text, while completely ignoring what it actually says.
You've already said enough to prove it.