If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
Krebs is comp'd, I am quite certain of that. He put out a statement back in November/December when this 'watermark' matter surfaced and he dismissed it as ludicrous.
Not holding my breath hahaha