So I've made the decision that I am not touching any of the experimental vaccines for medical reasons. However, there is an option that uses the same technology as your traditional flu shot, the Valneva inactivated shot, which won't be available probably until the end of the year.
I'd love to know what people's thoughts are on this. Again, very much aware that Q's are vax leery, but curious to hear why you all think.
With hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin showing promising results similar to Tamiflu in reducing the severity of Covid and keeping it from advancing to the stage of needing hospitalization when taken early, I don't know if a vaccine is even required. But, I would certainly consider a more traditionally manufactured vaccine if it is safe and effective over the mRNA variety. We will not know the full ramifications of mRMA for another 3-5 years.
Get both. I keep chlorine dioxide and black mica around as well. The Ivermectin you can get at Tractor Supply and others that sell to farmers/ranchers. It's main function won't be fighting cov however. What it really does well is is fight the vax. It is "anti-parasitic". The spike proteins shed by the vaxed can't survive any exposure to it. I think it should be taken by everyone who got the pcr test. The "mystery swab" released darpa designed a hydrogel to the blood brain barrier containing a parasite that attacks the pineal gland. Ivermectin eliminates that parasite as well.
And unfortunately on half of our US adult population. Stop there and leave the children to survive on their own.