What I find curious is that the general conservative community seems to have formed this consensus that we need guns to keep them from taking our guns, and moreover that any attempt to do so by force will be “crossing the line” and require an armed response. When in reality that’s nonsensical because we would be defending a right for the sake of maintaining the ability to defend it.
What the second amendment is really about is defending liberty from any and all government threats, which includes everything that is going on lately, from lockdowns to (almost) forced vaccination, to election fraud and the corruption of our political system. Right now I still have faith that white hats are in control, but if they make us wait much longer people will have to start taking a stand eventually. This is what our guns are for. Does anyone think the founding fathers would be sitting there muzzled and ostracized from their peers for their medical choices? Waiting for the concentration camps to go up?
What I find curious is that the general conservative community seems to have formed this consensus that we need guns to keep them from taking our guns, and moreover that any attempt to do so by force will be “crossing the line” and require an armed response. When in reality that’s nonsensical because we would be defending a right for the sake of maintaining the ability to defend it.
What the second amendment is really about is defending liberty from any and all government threats, which includes everything that is going on lately, from lockdowns to (almost) forced vaccination, to election fraud and the corruption of our political system. Right now I still have faith that white hats are in control, but if they make us wait much longer people will have to start taking a stand eventually. This is what our guns are for. Does anyone think the founding fathers would be sitting there muzzled and ostracized from their peers for their medical choices? Waiting for the concentration camps to go up?
They've been up for years