SAY IT AGAIN FOR THE PEDES IN THE BACK! Thinking like this must be the backbone of scientific study and, along with outside the box critical thinking, is what will drive us forward (regardless of the NPCs irrelevant whimpering). The left loves bashing religion, yet puts more blind faith in their appointed ‘betters’ than many followers, of any religion, place in their respective deities. Trust but verify (and adjust your trust if nec.)
And unfortunately I think we all greatly underestimated the amount of NPCs that would be willfully blind (honestly borderline complicit). That’s why we have to have this airtight: for posterity; we are more going to be making the case for history rather than arguing with hopeless chattel.
SAY IT AGAIN FOR THE PEDES IN THE BACK! Thinking like this must be the backbone of scientific study and, along with outside the box critical thinking, is what will drive us forward (regardless of the NPCs irrelevant whimpering). The left loves bashing religion, yet puts more blind faith in their appointed ‘betters’ than many followers, of any religion, place in their respective deities. Trust but verify (and adjust your trust if nec.)
"Trust but verify the science."
I like it, but I am sure the NPCs would simply lay baseless claims that "the science is settled" and is already verified.
And unfortunately I think we all greatly underestimated the amount of NPCs that would be willfully blind (honestly borderline complicit). That’s why we have to have this airtight: for posterity; we are more going to be making the case for history rather than arguing with hopeless chattel.