You're reading it correctly. None of the vaccines give you anything better than a 2% edge versus battling the vaccine naturally.
Now go read the Moderna study for 12-17 year olds. They gave the shot to 2400 people and then had 2400 unvaccinated in the control group. A few weeks later they checked in with everyone. None of the Moderna kids had gotten the coof, but four of the unvaxed did.
Based on this data, they gave the Moderna vaccine a 100% prevention rating!
But this also tells us only 1 in every 600 kids contracted the virus naturally in the same timeframe.
or am i reading this wrong?
You're reading it correctly. None of the vaccines give you anything better than a 2% edge versus battling the vaccine naturally.
Now go read the Moderna study for 12-17 year olds. They gave the shot to 2400 people and then had 2400 unvaccinated in the control group. A few weeks later they checked in with everyone. None of the Moderna kids had gotten the coof, but four of the unvaxed did.
Based on this data, they gave the Moderna vaccine a 100% prevention rating!
But this also tells us only 1 in every 600 kids contracted the virus naturally in the same timeframe.
That's CRAZY. Three weeks is not enough time to know if they were exposed to anything yet, let alone presume infection was prevented.