This article states he did (right near end) https://www.mountainhomemag.com/2021/05/01/356270/the-drug-that-cracked-covid
BBC makes no mention of it: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54418464
Trying to verify... sources appreciated.
This article states he did (right near end) https://www.mountainhomemag.com/2021/05/01/356270/the-drug-that-cracked-covid
BBC makes no mention of it: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54418464
Trying to verify... sources appreciated.
last Friday, President Trump announced that he and the First Lady have confirmed cases of COVID-19. Later that day, he was admitted to the Walter Reed Medical Center. His doctor said he received an eight gram dose of Regeneron's (NASDAQ:REGN) experimental antibody cocktail. He also received remdesivir, Gilead Sciences' (NASDAQ:GILD) antiviral treatment and a common steroid treatment called dexamethasone.
The President has since left the hospital. He tweeted a video crediting Regeneron's experimental treatment with his recovery.
Trump got the regneron treatment. He was supposed to make it available for free to all of us who wanted it.
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2020/10/10081975/what-is-regeneron-trump-covid-drug
Who cares if President Trump used Ivermectin? A billion people in India are using it now, with great results (and about 20 other countries as well). Those results are much more important.
Just an issue because an article I've been sharing says he used it - which obviously raises questions about other things in the article...
Jeezus - out of that entire novel-length article, you focus on one sentence that says President Trump secretly took Ivermectin while giving the credit to Regeneron.
You are either a complete idiot, or a shill looking desperately for some reason to discredit Ivermectin.
hey - what's with the attack? i think it's an amazing article and I'm learning how to defend it against others who would try and discredit it. Some of the people I'm in conversation with have some large barriers to overcome and they will focus on anything they can to try and discredit the powerful arguments in the rest of the article. Where I see conflicting views, I try to find the information that will allow me to discern my own view.
Good for you. Ignore those who react with hostility or insults instead of bothering to question and clarify.
thanks fren