Depending on the answer it could be a predictive or reactive variable.
If it's predictive it would be another piece of evidence for the Q and Trump connection.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
I don't know; but where is Durham? He must be remaking the movie "The Invisible Man" because I sure don't see him.
Spending $1.5 M in the last 6 months. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice-department-releases-financial-activity-report-john-durham-special-counsel-investigation
And, Brennan appears to be really scared: "I think, at a minimum, it was very unethical, even immoral, and maybe illegal activity that was taking place between some members of the Trump campaign and Russia," Brennan added. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/john-brennan-floats-financial-front-as-hidden-piece-of-trump-russia-puzzle
It would be a "Shocker" if Durham came out of his hiding hole from the woodwork and spill everything he found. That is if he exists.
If I recall correctly, 17 said it first waay before Trump ever said it.
eh, it's more of a Q proof if Q said it first then Trump says it. It's a unique phrase and if Q was the first to say it then Trump says it, it brings more of a connection
That's what I meant with predictive vs reactive. I should've been more clear about it.
Also why I'd like to know if anybody knows if Trump ever said it before Q.
Gotcha, in that case I completely agree, just thought you meant something else from the title. It's such a unique phrase that if Q did say it first it is just another Q proof. Trump didn't say "When is Durham releasing his report?" he says verbatim "Where's Durham?"
I am fairly certain that Q made mention of the Durham appointment shortly after it happened, and long before Trump ever mentioned him.