Brittain tell Poland to harrass german border cities, tell them that they will help them if Germany does smth.
Source on this? I've addressed others making these claims before, they're pretty routinely found to be holdout war justification propaganda from Germany and not actual events, for the most part.
Easiest reason why this would have been totally illogical: Poland had not even mobilized most of its army when war broke out; they'd been repeatedly told to delay by the Brits, because the Brits claimed they still believed peace was possible.
Chirchill air raids british cities to get british people to be pro war (they were anti war)
Source?
The U.S also knew about Pearl Harbor attack but didnt notify or counter because they wantwd a shitshow so the American people would back a war effort (also first war america only drafted people, guess who got drafted?)
Ah, but how much did they know about Pearl Harbor? Or was it just that they knew some attack was imminent, but not where?
WW2 was just a ploy to give more land to Soviets. Why did Soviets need to take Poland? They were allies, no?
Not exactly, however the Allies did cuck out of their responsibilities to east and central Europe giving them that.
Note how Stalin was, by most accounts, glad to work with Hitler, including partitioning Poland.
Poland and the USSR were never/not allies; it took the majority of Polish patriots and massive amounts of civilians being exterminated/executed/etc. by BOTH regimes for the Soviets to be able to impose communism.
There was a whole war fought by the brand new Polish state to prevent the spread of Communism into the ripe war-softened Europe; the Polish-Soviet war in ~1920.
Hitler brown shirts? Was the answer to antifa back then, just like Proud Boys now.
Proud boys don't use guns or violence for the most part. They've been a bit of a paper tiger, especially after the fuckery in their leadership. Brownshirts ARE still comparable to antifa; there is literally 0 reason there couldn't be two antifa-like groups fighting each other.
No, you can't just point to a 10 hour documentary as "source" for individual claims. That'd be like me pointing to "internet" as a source. IF you MUST find me individual timestamps in the documentary, but I would rather a stronger source than a shoddy obvious propaganda piece.
Try going to Poland or Ukraine or even some places in Russia and saying that.
They'll tell you that you're a total fool for believing that only one side committed atrocities. They'll tell you that both mass-murdered in the millions and both put state before God.
Germany may not have torn down statues of it's own, but it certainly tore/burnt/blew down statues in the countries it invaded.
BOTH were socialist nations. BOTH were atrocious and despicable. To presume that only one is is absurdity.
Source on this? I've addressed others making these claims before, they're pretty routinely found to be holdout war justification propaganda from Germany and not actual events, for the most part.
Easiest reason why this would have been totally illogical: Poland had not even mobilized most of its army when war broke out; they'd been repeatedly told to delay by the Brits, because the Brits claimed they still believed peace was possible.
Source?
Ah, but how much did they know about Pearl Harbor? Or was it just that they knew some attack was imminent, but not where?
Not exactly, however the Allies did cuck out of their responsibilities to east and central Europe giving them that.
Note how Stalin was, by most accounts, glad to work with Hitler, including partitioning Poland.
Poland and the USSR were never/not allies; it took the majority of Polish patriots and massive amounts of civilians being exterminated/executed/etc. by BOTH regimes for the Soviets to be able to impose communism.
There was a whole war fought by the brand new Polish state to prevent the spread of Communism into the ripe war-softened Europe; the Polish-Soviet war in ~1920.
Proud boys don't use guns or violence for the most part. They've been a bit of a paper tiger, especially after the fuckery in their leadership. Brownshirts ARE still comparable to antifa; there is literally 0 reason there couldn't be two antifa-like groups fighting each other.
No, you can't just point to a 10 hour documentary as "source" for individual claims. That'd be like me pointing to "internet" as a source. IF you MUST find me individual timestamps in the documentary, but I would rather a stronger source than a shoddy obvious propaganda piece.
God's work my friend. Keep spreading the truth. One day, no one will be able to deny it.
Nice historical revisionism there.
Try going to Poland or Ukraine or even some places in Russia and saying that.
They'll tell you that you're a total fool for believing that only one side committed atrocities. They'll tell you that both mass-murdered in the millions and both put state before God.
Germany may not have torn down statues of it's own, but it certainly tore/burnt/blew down statues in the countries it invaded.
BOTH were socialist nations. BOTH were atrocious and despicable. To presume that only one is is absurdity.
You're a nazi sympathizer, it's very clear.
I’ve watched that. And then read about Berlin after the Nazis. I’ll take the former any day
Hitler was a closet fag, was into scatology, and fucked and married his cousin
Nazis were peak degeneracy
The jews rule you. You're a sheep.
Well said!