I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us.
Darwin was wrong about anything being up to chance though. Evolution aims at targets and builds (or creates) what is necessary to gap the bridge.
As far as I can tell, that's a big part of what it means to be in the image of God, the creator.
"I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us."
Agreed. In the book of Genesis, you'll discover the chronology of life is plagiarized by Charles Darwin for his own 'fantasticalized' interpetion. Even Darwin's edicts are grossly misrepresented today. His observations were of environmental 'adaptations' that exist as part of species traits for survival. This is explained through 'optimal balance' for each species, which persists in each species for their immutable existence.
I don't see the issue with believing in God creating an ever evolving world. We can see evolution in all human frontiers. If God created the evolutionary process encoded in life, then God clearly still created us.
Darwin was wrong about anything being up to chance though. Evolution aims at targets and builds (or creates) what is necessary to gap the bridge.
As far as I can tell, that's a big part of what it means to be in the image of God, the creator.
Agreed. In the book of Genesis, you'll discover the chronology of life is plagiarized by Charles Darwin for his own 'fantasticalized' interpetion. Even Darwin's edicts are grossly misrepresented today. His observations were of environmental 'adaptations' that exist as part of species traits for survival. This is explained through 'optimal balance' for each species, which persists in each species for their immutable existence.