I don't even know how this would work, but basically as a libertarian I started as against borders because they are government-created boundaries
Then I recognized that without borders it seemed difficult to decide who was and wasn't a citizen and that wasn't fair, and that it seemed like certain people in government wanted to bring in more people to get them to vote to destroy freedom, so actually the libertarian position would be for borders to protect freedom
However, now with covid we also see borders being used to prevent people from moving - some people have been stuck in countries they attempted to live in temporarily or were on vacation at, or haven't been able to visit countries because of border restrictions
The libertarian (ancap) position on borders is that private borders are fine (like, on land that a person owns, they can choose who can "immigrate" to it or not, or like private cities can decide who is allowed to visit)
So are any conservatives against borders or what do you think of this issue in light of recent developments?
Tyranny can exist with and without representative government, and with or without borders, but you cannot have representative government without borders.
What do you do when megacorps own all of the land and trap you with their AnCap-friendly "private borders"?
It is possible for ancapistan to become tyrannical or chaotic, just like it is possible for a king to be despotic and dictatorial. This is not a problem unique to anarcho-capitalism but exists in all systems, but anarcho-capitalism is argued for over alternatives, just like we might argue that it is better for citizens to be free today rather than for some to have been slaves in the past. Many problems and solutions you might see with ancapistan you might similarly find with governments.