We’ve heard that when these mRNA vaccines were used on animals, the outcome was them dying from inflamed organs after they were re-exposed to garden variety corona virus. We know that these vaccines skipped human testing and we are currently in that phase right now. A lot of scientists and doctors are predicting a lot of deaths this coming flu season, mostly of the vaccinated people, whose bodies are being pathogenically primed right now from the spike proteins in these experimental vaccines. There was a recent study that came out that showed the Pfizer vaccines are over 99% graphene oxide, which is cytotoxic for humans and will cause a litany if issues ultimately causing death. I can go on. My point is, this seems to be the most important thing happening right now. They’re administering the depop shot in all places possible. Biden is talking about going door to door, very openly and non chalantly I might add. That’s terrifying. I know we say that the audits are the thing to focus on and that the McAfee, or apartment building collapse and whatever else are just distractions. But the more I learn about the vaccines, and just how deadly they are and what they’re designed to do, and the absolute havoc it’s going to cause, I can’t help but think that everything else is a distraction. This should be what we’re all focusing on and stopping. I have yet to hear a valid explanation as to why Trump seems to still support this? Is it his ego because he developed it and has a traditional view on vaccines? Everything else about Trump and the corruption and evil he’s exposed and shed light on has been spot on and am so grateful for all of that. But this one issue I’m really having trouble getting past. Could it be that all of this was done to control the awakened part of the population to keep us quelled while this death vaccine continues to be deployed while the ‘President’ is talking about ways to get it available to everyone and going door to door to provide info on it?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Can you show me the study you mentioned about Pfizer COVID vaccines are mostly graphene oxide? I can’t seem to find it through either the open access journals or the subscription-based ones. That would be a big deal and I’d be interested in the research on it.
Here’s a video on it: https://rumble.com/vjk0u1-breaking-astrazeneca-vaccine-vials-examined-by-researchers-confirm-toxic-po.html
Okay, I was able to find the study myself after seeing what they showed.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529
You guys should really research this thing yourselves and see if you agree with her conclusion.
This was a report over the test of a single bottle that this lab received by courier. They specifically state in the report that they cannot trace the origins of this bottle. You can find this info near the top of the report.
It was labeled as a COVID-19 vaccine, but because they could not verify that, they did not label their study as such, only calling it an “aqueous solution”, which means, “something dissolved in water.”
When they looked at it through a microscope, they found possible traces of graphene derivatives, which may include oxidized graphene. They said they could not actually be sure of that using the tools they were using, and would not commit to that conclusion.
I could not find in the report anything about it being 99% of the substance. A trace amount is not uncommon in vaccines. I could not find anything linking this to Pfizer.
The study also shouts multiple times that this was just a microscope view of a single sample, and that no conclusions can be drawn from this study alone.
This is basically a lab report of a mystery bottle that showed up from somewhere.
You’re welcome to read through it yourself and see if I missed anything.
https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/graphene-oxide.html?m=1 I found this article on it as well. Also here is a clip of the interview I originally heard it from where she mentions the over 99% and the fact that there is some uncertainty about it being a Pfizer vaccine, although I believe it was labeled as such and there was a documented chain of custody, but possibly not very strong. At least this was the way I interpreted it. I understand this is a very recent development and could be proven to be false. https://www.bitchute.com/video/vI2Di0DhVXRF/
Wherever she is getting that information, it’s not in the report she’s citing. They specifically said they had no idea where the bottle came from and could not confirm what was in it, except that it may have had a graphene derivative in it. It makes no claims about Pfizer, the vaccine, or anything else like that.
They couldn’t even confirm that it was the vaccine, which is why they don’t call it one in the report.
People can say whatever they want in an interview. Research means looking at the data, and the data they gave us doesn’t support the claims they’re making. If they want to produce new data, then we can continue researching.
I'm hearing now that this information has been confirmed, but not sure how to verify. Have you seen anything? And thank you for your help