I NEED HELP PUSHING THE ARIZONA AUDIT INTO THE MAINSTREAM
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
I have posted the preliminary audit results into a comment on the Telegraph after an insanely anti Trump article in what is supposed to be a Conservative newspaper, but it keeps being ignored because most people only look at "Top Comments" of which they cap at about five. So my post of the audit results is just sitting there without wider coverage. If you go to New Posts it will be easily recognised. Many thanks.
Sorry Buddy but if it made its way through the twatter nazi’s censorship bureau, more than likely they are lies. If you are not extremely suspicious of that county in the first place after not being transparent and complying with handing over the items that were requested for this audit, than you sir are a very gullible sap who continues to believe the traitorous thieves who got caught red handed.Withholding and destroying election related property and materials, to me is a very serious problem. I still have not heard an answer as to why a bunch of ballots ended up at one of their barns that just happened to catch fire and destroy that evidence. Are you that gullible and stupid or just a sycophant drone who’s in too deep?
Can it be verified outside twatter?yes. I wouldn’t and don’t trust anything on twatter. I don’t use known enemy outlets for news or trusted information. Cyber ninjas have a stellar record! Look it up. Maracopa county is being extremely deceitful, TN yes have lied and withheld evidence, why would would you trust them. Twitter is known for censorship and intentionally spreading and allowing outright lies. Why do you still trust known liars?
Do you understand this process? That’s like saying just because a statistician has never ran election numbers, his knowledge of numbers has no relevance. What about a person who investigates counterfeit money? Would his knowledge not be applicable because he’s never worked on counterfeit ballots in an election? Counterfeit pieces of paper are exactly that that, prices of paper nothing special and Numbers are numbers. What about cyber security specialists? Just because someone has never seen election related cyber hacks, does that mean they wouldn’t be able to detect if voting machines were hacked? Do they link up and connect to the internet just like every other machine? Pretty basic stuff that it seems your straining to try and not see. Why are you against a full forensic audit? Did you participate in this scam? It takes 3 sworn affidavits to try and convict a murderer, how many affidavits across the country were signed about fraud that was being committed? Are you that dishonest?