Yes the South seceded from the Union to protect slavery, also claiming states' rights in order to protect slavery. The North fought the Civil War to save the Union. As the South fought FOR slavery, the Union therefore was necessarily fighting AGAINST it. - The Great Awakening

Yes the South seceded from the Union to protect slavery, also claiming states' rights in order to protect slavery. The North fought the Civil War to save the Union. As the South fought FOR slavery, the Union therefore was necessarily fighting AGAINST it. (www.reference.com)

posted 3 years ago by ArmyLady 3 years ago by ArmyLady +32 / -0

28 comments

28 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (28)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Octobyte17 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

When you say that, they say "The parties flipped". The correct response is this "When did this happen? Show me.". It'll be a neat trick if they can pinpoint when this happened, because I've been looking for a long time and I cannot find an instance where the 'rats n Reps changed permanent allegiances in relation.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– ArmyLady [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Exactly!!

So follow their logic. The Republicans back then DID end slavery, squash the KKK etc., so dems now claim that legacy as something they are proud of? okay . . . then how are all whites to be blamed for slavery & the KKK etc.?? you too?? ha. hoist on their own petard.

We need to press until their brains explode from cognitive dissonance.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q