I always find it funny how the pressure is always applied one way.
Want to know about 9-11, you must be a truther.
Think the moon landing is fake, you must be a crack-pot.
Want to investigate the holocaust, you must be a holocaust-denier.
Think JFK didn't get killed by a magic bullet, well you must be a conspiracy nut.
If the facts are there. You should be able to rely on the facts. Oh someone doesn't believe in the moon landing, let's refer to the flight logs. Let's refer to the tons of pictures they took. Let's refer to everything NASA did to be as transparent as possible to establish the burden of proof required of the greatest claims ever made by man-kind. Instead of, "oh you don't take them at their word, you must be crazy".
I always find it funny how the pressure is always applied one way.
Want to know about 9-11, you must be a truther.
Think the moon landing is fake, you must be a crack-pot.
Want to investigate the holocaust, you must be a holocaust-denier.
Think JFK didn't get killed by a magic bullet, well you must be a conspiracy nut.
If the facts are there. You should be able to rely on the facts. Oh someone doesn't believe in the moon landing, let's refer to the flight logs. Let's refer to the tons of pictures they took. Let's refer to everything NASA did to be as transparent as possible to establish the burden of proof required of the greatest claims ever made by man-kind. Instead of, "oh you don't take them at their word, you must be crazy".
Like truther is an insult.