"If it's not Koch's postulates we're using as the set of criteria for proving its existence, then some other sound set of criteria must be used, which has simply not happened."
I see. So you use Koch's principle as a standard because there is no more appropriate standard.
"Understand that it is a mockery of scientific reasoning and the logical principles such reasoning is based on. "
Since you seem to be well versed in it, could you explain it to me?
Specifically, points like, "This sentence is wrong in this way. That's the kind of thing I'm open to.
"If it's not Koch's postulates we're using as the set of criteria for proving its existence, then some other sound set of criteria must be used, which has simply not happened."
I see. So you use Koch's principle as a standard because there is no more appropriate standard.
I'll check the link.