I’m sure this has been discussed already, but it’s important to remember and stay focus on facts.
“Knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fine and imprisonment.”
If you have conversations with your employer, co worker, church, school, friends etc remind them of this.
If they want to discredit VAERS reporting, then ask them why aren’t charges being brought to thousands of people. Why would thousands of people risk going to prison? There’s no logical reason to lie about this. The normies won’t have an answer.
The data to prove you’re point is often not hidden or found on websites the mainstream folks have never heard of. Show them facts. Show them evidence. Ask them questions.
Don’t comply with these ridiculous vaccine passports and requirements at work. I will likely be fired in the next two months or be forced to find a new job, but I’m not going down without defending my rights. The next shitty job will likely try the same exact shit.
We’re at a critical point in human rights history. Fight back with facts.
The easiest answer to this question is provided by VAERS itself: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
So a 98 year old with liver cancer dies a week after the vaccine? Reported to VAERS.
Chronic smoker dies of pneumonia a month after the shot? VAERS.
You get the shot and then the next day you have the sniffles? That’s a legitimate reason to submit to VAERS.
Basically, if the vaccine can’t immediately be ruled out and it was given recently, the death is reported to VAERS.
But wouldn’t at least some of the deaths be guaranteed to be from the vaccine anyway, even if it’s being flooded with deaths that probably aren’t from the vaccine?
Well, no. Again, from VAERS:
So VAERS accepts literally all reports without verification, and requires all deaths and illnesses that pop up soon after the vaccine to be reported by practitioners.
How is that useful?
For you, it’s not. At all. But for researchers, it allows them to see what needs to be verified, and to focus on on localized spikes in the data to investigate specific batches.
This data is available to you, but it’s not curated for your use. It is impossible to tell how many deaths, if any, were caused by the vaccine using VAERS data.
The vaccine could literally be 100% saline and still show exactly the same data we’re looking at now. Nothing is verified and a lot of garbage data gets reported because it’s required to be. Because this data isn’t designed to see whether the vaccine is killing people. It’s designed to identify spikes where bad batches of the vaccine might be or to indicate trends over time.
I would highly recommend reading the VAERS guide to understanding its data. It’s all there.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
What I find fascinating is the CDC’s reaction to the swine flu vaccine in 1976 vs. now. In 1976, with few initial side effects (look at this : https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-1007_article) they decided to pull it from market. They even mentioned anecdotal reports. Those numbers were only a few dozen. Granted, the numbers initially vaxxed weren’t what we have now.
Now, with VAERS we have over 500,000 and counting negative reports. Why the different approach?