It's been known for a while that individual printers can be tracked by specialized marks a printer makes on pages, similar to a water mark. It's not super wasy, more likely in the realm of Intel agencies, but still possible.
all the actual real mail in ballots had watermark but that didn't stopped them counting them multiple time, the machine has no security measure to detect duplicates
Ah, I understand. You are correct. Just saying there is such thing as printer fingerprinting, it's an interesting kinda nerdy thing concerning privacy is all. Just wanted to make people aware it exists.
It's been known for a while that individual printers can be tracked by specialized marks a printer makes on pages, similar to a water mark. It's not super wasy, more likely in the realm of Intel agencies, but still possible.
Yeah look at the problem that we are having trying to prove that
What do you mean?
all the actual real mail in ballots had watermark but that didn't stopped them counting them multiple time, the machine has no security measure to detect duplicates
Ah, I understand. You are correct. Just saying there is such thing as printer fingerprinting, it's an interesting kinda nerdy thing concerning privacy is all. Just wanted to make people aware it exists.