DISCUSSION: The diff btwn a paid shill polluting the WIN and a "newb" that's suddenly red-pilled watching the Afghanistan fiasco unfold can be hard to see. Mods might approve (or even sticky!) "doom" posts. WTF! WHY? That's a VOTE OF CONFIDENCE that you guys can help them thru. Here they come! πΊπΈ
(greatawakening.win)
π£οΈ DISCUSSION π¬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (122)
sorted by:
I'm certainly glad we are leaving Afghanistan after two decades. I elated. But as many have pointed out the execution was done poorly by design. China owns Biden obviously. Trump would have done it differently. Actually any other President, well just about any other would have done it differently.
Now here is what where I can be called a paid 'shill'. Broke and not paid. But many will disagree with me but I liked Biden's speech. Did he write it? Does he believe it? No, but everything he said blaming Bush (inferred) ect is true.
I hope we triple crossed the Taliban and the Chinese with this move. Unfortunately there is about 15 thousand Americans stuck there. Not a good look on an administration that cheated to get in.
Who fucking knows what is happening beyond the curtain... Some people claim it is all the show,others not. If you looking for sure answers I have bad news - we are searching,researching but we cannot be sure...
Majority of Q proofs are "coincidences" alone are allowing excellent plausible deniability,but there are too many found to simply claim it is nothing. It is really not probable even despite having "bias". Somebody would say that it isnt probability and math because we don't know all possibilities,but it is bullshit as world is physical not mathematical (math is language not reality),and peaks of not probable things usually not happen in real world.