Fwd:

FDA quietly admits that the licensed Pfizer vaccine and the authorized Pfizer vaccine are identical w.r.t. safety/efficacy, but they are "legally distinct."  That's code for one has manufacturer liability, while the other doesn't.  It is also code for "we don't want to impose a mandate on the EUA product cause it is illegal, but we can probably get away with a mandate on the licensed product."

page 12 AA.  This tells you that yes, we licensed the vaccine, but...there is a lot of the old vaccines out there, actually "a significant amount" and this amount will be considered an EUA and will continue to be used.   Now, why would they do that?  Why specify that identical versions of the product will be legally different?  Because they need the license to impose the mandates.  But they need the EUA to evade liability.   Along with the license comes liability for the manufacturer. (While all EUA products were given a liability shield).

Unfortunately, our federal overlords would prefer us to be without recourse if we are injured, rather than have Pfizer defend its product in court.  So, the feds want us to THINK the vaccine we are receiving is licensed, which will make people submit because they think it can now be mandated, but instead we are almost certain to receive the EUA vials instead, to save Pfizer's behind. 

In conclusion: The Pfizer Covid vaccine is not approved and not licensed--still EUA. What was approved was the "license application" for the COVID vaccine to be approved.