Not a lawyer, but I would argue that while the 22nd amendment on its face states that, “no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice…”, the subordinate language tying the service of the majority of a term to “counting” a partial term served would provide a basis for the case that any late-term remedy of Trump’s reinstatement would not be subject to the term limit set by the 22nd amendment, due to the full term having not been served by Trump.
Not a lawyer, but I would argue that while the 22nd amendment on its face states that, “no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice…”, the subordinate language tying the service of the majority of a term to “counting” a partial term served would provide a basis for the case that any late-term remedy of Trump’s reinstatement would not be subject to the term limit set by the 22nd amendment, due to the full term having not been served by Trump.
Clearly, if Trump were to re-take office on or after January '23, he should be allowed another term. Military in charge until then?