Something is definitely off about her. I mean, ". . . no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact."--right? What I want to know is this: Why didn't she ask Sidney what her legal team meant by that, and how does that square up with her mission at hand? Makes you wonder what she actually believes and what her motives truly are.
Something is definitely off about her. I mean, ". . . no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact."--right? What I want to know is this: Why didn't she ask Sidney what her legal team meant by that, and how does that square up with her mission at hand? Makes you wonder what she actually believes and what her motives truly are.