ABSTRACT Three COVID-19 vaccines in the US have been released for sale by the FDA under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on a clinical trial design employing a surrogate primary endpoint for health, severe infections with COVID-19. This clinical trial design has been proven dangerously misleading. Many fields of medicine, oncology for example, have abandoned the use of disease specific endpoints for the primary endpoint of pivotal clinical trials (cancer deaths for example) and have adopted “all cause mortality or morbidity” as the proper scientific endpoint of a clinical trial. Pivotal clinical trial data from the 3 marketed COVID-19 vaccines was reanalyzed using “all cause severe morbidity", a scientific measure of health, as the primary endpoint. “All cause severe morbidity” in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statically significant increase in “all cause severe morbidity" in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 more severe events than the control group (p=0.00001). The Pfizer data was grossly incomplete but data provided showed the vaccination group suffered 90 more severe events than the control group (p=0.000014), when only including “unsolicited” adverse events. The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 more severe events than the control group (p=0.00001). These findings contrast the manufacturers’ inappropriate surrogate endpoints: Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 cases of severe COVD-19 requiring medical attention out of 19,630 immunized; Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized; Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized. Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe.
Comments (3)
sorted by:
Similar type stats coming up in other papers and data from death rates. Hopefully some Anon in this is building a decent archive if the White-Hats aren’t already. The amount of people to be tried for crimes against humanity will be staggering I think. Hopefully it’s not well beyond what the White-Hats have prepared to handle. At some point it’s going to get so deep, that people that really needed to be executed may escape while lighter offenders may be executed. There must be not one quarter given for ANY of the mass offenders! Well, except for that quarter hollow-point piece of lead passing through their brain at 760MPH!
We won't get a good cost/benefit analysis for adults in the near future, because the hospitalization/mortality rates for COVID have been so inflated---whether it was by counting all flu cases as COVID, false positives and crazy CDC statistical manipulations. The available data, through the EUA proposals and VAERS, are weak. But, this article is a good start. . . .the FDA is only looking at a few end points, like myocarditis in young adults and thrombotic events, then saying (like it's self-evident) that the "benefits outweigh the costs."
Excellent Post!