this has a long history - 4 years now perhaps? Wasnt there a law 'pede that pointed out changes in the Pacer reporting system that implied this were mundane artifacts of the normal course of business? I don't recall the details.
At any rate, it was also pointed out that if these were real, there also might be multiple indictments for each individual.
There can also be more than one name contained in a sealed indictment - so the actual number of persons involved might be significantly higher.
Began tracking them in 2018. Watched the numbers go up to 40,000 with Sessions and Huber. Everyone was astonished at such a high number. It had never been seen before.
Someone else noticed if you click on county at the bottom of the page....and then scroll past the southern border counties - interesting numbers pop up.
this has a long history - 4 years now perhaps? Wasnt there a law 'pede that pointed out changes in the Pacer reporting system that implied this were mundane artifacts of the normal course of business? I don't recall the details.
At any rate, it was also pointed out that if these were real, there also might be multiple indictments for each individual.
There can also be more than one name contained in a sealed indictment - so the actual number of persons involved might be significantly higher.
Began tracking them in 2018. Watched the numbers go up to 40,000 with Sessions and Huber. Everyone was astonished at such a high number. It had never been seen before.
Someone else noticed if you click on county at the bottom of the page....and then scroll past the southern border counties - interesting numbers pop up.