Its going to be an interesting few weeks coming up at work .. After bidens mandate .. I work for a large comany owned by buffet .. A big liberal .. So i am sure the company will comply .. I have been there 30 years .. Not many know and can do what i do .. Not as good at least .. Ive only missed 8 days in 30 years .. I will not comply .. I will not take the vax or weekly testing .. They will have to fire me . they need me , more than i need them. If they fire me , im coming after that buffet money .. F these commie bastards
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
The key piece for EVERYONE to factor is "Comirnaty" versus the current EUA clotshot. A company can mandate an approved clotshot, which this mystery juice is NOT. There was a lawyer on here a day or two ago speaking how to documented properly. I am paraphrasing, but if I remember correctly, go to the facility for the injection and ask to see the vial when it is your turn, ask for the FDA approved "Comirnaty" when they do not or cannot produce, you refuse. Send a note to your HR stating that what is being offered is NOT fda approved and once an approved juice is available, you will consider it at that point. That sets up the best scenario for you, if my memory was correct.
Once there is an available fda approved product, a company can mandate as part of the terms of employment. That is caselaw and has been before the pandemic. The calling of a pandemic just reinforces the need, in their eyes. So our best angle, imho, is the point that Comirnaty is not available.
Others please speak up, just want to make sure other anons and hopefully, a law anon, can poke holes in my statement or provide additional depth so folks can solidify their legal standing. Uncharted territory and do not know, since it is a pandemic, if they can use that as a shield to protect them legally too?
Give them hell and document 7 ways to Sunday email and snail mail yourself to archive and document timeframe too.
I'm a law anon, but not an American one. This isn't my area of practice, either - I'm just sharing what I found.
I don't think that the distinction is as salient or relevant as people are making it out to be. The FDA has specified that COMIRNATY and the EUA vaccine are materially identical (i.e. they're only "distinct" in a legal sense), and can be used interchangeably. The vaccines contain identical ingredients and are manufactured using the same process. The products are only "legally distinct" to the extent that they will bear different labels - the FDA press release is pretty clear COMIRNATY is just the existing vaccine, but marketed under a new name, and that both products are approved for use in 16+.
Sources:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
https://heavy.com/news/comirnaty-vs-pfizer-vaccine-legally-distinct/
Oh, plus they are all using aborted human babies in developing process. There’s religious reasons and moral ones.
Religious reasons are definitely the way to go, imo.
Sounds good for someone in that position, with one exception, how does that work with the one that supposedly just got fda apporved?