That is a strong claim with scant evidence and a lot of history to go through, I can listen but do not guarantee I will agree at the end of the journey
Contextually based alternative history of what actually happened and presentable documentation to validate said claim, followed with concise logical determinism based ideas of why it can't be any other way and how what is presented is propaganda and why that propaganda benefited anyone. It is difficult to dispute history which is why it must be supported with many pieces of context, logic and documentation that substantiates the claims
That is a strong claim with scant evidence and a lot of history to go through, I can listen but do not guarantee I will agree at the end of the journey
Contextually based alternative history of what actually happened and presentable documentation to validate said claim, followed with concise logical determinism based ideas of why it can't be any other way and how what is presented is propaganda and why that propaganda benefited anyone. It is difficult to dispute history which is why it must be supported with many pieces of context, logic and documentation that substantiates the claims