This is the perfect example of the disinfo technique called "poisoning the well".
The info is solid. The guy has good information. He is competent and intelligent and qualified enough that the FDA saw fit to have him speak at this event. It's not like he's going to be presenting bad information.
So how do you poison this information? You make it look like he has some credential he doesn't actually have, or make it look like he works somewhere he doesn't actually work.
Even though that doesn't affect the fact that his information is solid, and he is a speaker that the FDA expressly allowed to speak at their event, they will use this straw-manned "debunking" to smear him and distract the sleepers from hearing from what he has to say.
This is the perfect example of the disinfo technique called "poisoning the well".
The info is solid. The guy has good information. He is competent and intelligent and qualified enough that the FDA saw fit to have him speak at this event. It's not like he's going to be presenting bad information.
So how do you poison this information? You make it look like he has some credential he doesn't actually have, or make it look like he works somewhere he doesn't actually work.
Even though that doesn't affect the fact that his information is solid, and he is a speaker that the FDA expressly allowed to speak at their event, they will use this straw-manned "debunking" to smear him and distract the sleepers from hearing from what he has to say.
That's exactly what I'm afraid of.