However, he said "we" have a lawsuit coming in 4-5 weeks.
If he's working with the audit, etc. then "we" could mean Arizona v. US
Neither Lindell nor Arizona can challenge how Wisconsin runs Wisconsin's elections, but Arizona might have standing to challenge how Congress counted Arizona's electoral votes (or lack of electoral votes).
If they (Arizona) says, "Wait, we never cast any electors! Those were fraudulent electors. The legislature never approved that..." That sounds like a different question.
I’ll save you the time and emotional investment: “he has no standing”
Yes, they'd throw out Lindell v. ...
However, he said "we" have a lawsuit coming in 4-5 weeks.
If he's working with the audit, etc. then "we" could mean Arizona v. US
Neither Lindell nor Arizona can challenge how Wisconsin runs Wisconsin's elections, but Arizona might have standing to challenge how Congress counted Arizona's electoral votes (or lack of electoral votes).
If they (Arizona) says, "Wait, we never cast any electors! Those were fraudulent electors. The legislature never approved that..." That sounds like a different question.