Seriously people, its a solid black triangle that has been postprocessed to remove the fill. Look at the bold text, its also had its fill removed. The red triangle up the top has overlapped text because its red.
I wanted this to be a smoking gun, but its just not, and is distracting us from the real fraud
This is the dumbest explanation I’ve ever heard. You’re saying that a process taken that not just removed the “fill” as you call it, but left a perfectly clean 5 pixel stroke on the triangle. Just...because? Why would it do that?
Why would it randomly remove the "fill" in bolded text and not in all text? Unless this was done manually and that makes less sense.
This makes me think more that the pre-printed ones were just sloppy and off.
If the fill was a different shade or color, it could be missing in print or scan, but these are solid colors (even the red bold letters don't have a stroke so it would make more sense that they would just uniformly disappear.
It's arbitrary. If it was a vector, maybe, but that would only be true as long as maintained as a vector, meaning never printed or scanned.
If the scanning or processing software set a threshold for removing all shapes and applying a stroke of a certain size, that could make sense but I would expect to see more fill removed elsewhere and this would concern me that the scans were being automatically tampered with and I would not trust the process without a good explanation.
I am no expert on the subject. I remain open to the possibility: Ballot pictures show a solid black triangle. Feel free to call me a fool all you want.
You can’t just grab some random link and think that it applies to anything. This is for Autocad. Nobody would use autocad for layout and printing documents like this. On top of that, the user above said it was a post process. What is described in this link is not a post process but a setting.
https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/green-ballot-envelope-signature-20201013.jpg
Seriously people, its a solid black triangle that has been postprocessed to remove the fill. Look at the bold text, its also had its fill removed. The red triangle up the top has overlapped text because its red.
I wanted this to be a smoking gun, but its just not, and is distracting us from the real fraud
This is the dumbest explanation I’ve ever heard. You’re saying that a process taken that not just removed the “fill” as you call it, but left a perfectly clean 5 pixel stroke on the triangle. Just...because? Why would it do that?
To save ink when printing...
Why would it randomly remove the "fill" in bolded text and not in all text? Unless this was done manually and that makes less sense.
This makes me think more that the pre-printed ones were just sloppy and off.
If the fill was a different shade or color, it could be missing in print or scan, but these are solid colors (even the red bold letters don't have a stroke so it would make more sense that they would just uniformly disappear.
I assume theres a threshold for what is considered filled shape, and what is considered line
It's arbitrary. If it was a vector, maybe, but that would only be true as long as maintained as a vector, meaning never printed or scanned.
If the scanning or processing software set a threshold for removing all shapes and applying a stroke of a certain size, that could make sense but I would expect to see more fill removed elsewhere and this would concern me that the scans were being automatically tampered with and I would not trust the process without a good explanation.
Looks like everything wider than 2x the stroke to me? The triangles, the "sign within the box" text, the border around the signature box...
Just read another post detailing this. Makes sense.
I have never scanned anything with solid images and have it come out as an outline. You have to be a fool to believe this.
I am no expert on the subject. I remain open to the possibility: Ballot pictures show a solid black triangle. Feel free to call me a fool all you want.
You can’t just grab some random link and think that it applies to anything. This is for Autocad. Nobody would use autocad for layout and printing documents like this. On top of that, the user above said it was a post process. What is described in this link is not a post process but a setting.