Because the triangle is solid black and the stamp text is also black, SO if you scan the image with a camera it cant differentiate between the black triangle ink and the stamp black text ink, your own eye could barely even notice the black stamp text on a solid black triangle. the ballot image seems to have some sort of replication algorithm that only traces and recreates the outlines of what it detects which is why the original ballot is a solid black triangle and the ballot image is a clear triangle, this also explains the weird warping around all of the stamp text, every ballot image has a different warping due to the random placement of the stamp.
e.g the recreated image isn't going to print the outline of the stamp within the solid black triangle because there IS NO OUTLINE to trace leaving the whole area blank making it "appear" as though the stamp text goes underneath when it actually went over the triangle. you can actually see the outline algorithm at work in the top left ballot image picture where it adds a spike to the triangle because it thinks the "A" in "Approved" is part of the triangle. <-------- sauces- Ballot Image: https://files.catbox.moe/7ezvfe.png Actual Ballot: https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/green-ballot-envelope-signature-20201013.jpg
Focusing on and spreading photoshopgate(yeah im gonna call it that pogg) takes away from the point of why the images were presented in the first place, which is the fact that they put the verified stamp on ballots that don't even have a signature on them xD but hey at least now everyone has seen the stamp on ballots which no signature without noticing it, maybe that is why shiva mentioned photoshopgate, so that everyone on both sides spreads and debates the photoshopgate without realizing they are spreading indisputable evidence that they have verified ballots WITH NO SIGNATURE ;)
This is exactly the same technique they used with the draft summary that they "leaked", Jovan Pulitzer basically admitted that the draft leak was done by the audit team to bait the media in this interview around 32:00 ;) https://rumble.com/vmxq93-jovan-pulitzer-reaction-to-maricopa-county-audit-september-24-2021.html
absolute classic
EDIT: Great debate in comments going into further detail.
With Occam's Razor as a guide, maybe it's a much simpler explanation. The triangle and the "rubber stamp" images were simply separate graphic items for the person to work with, along with several other graphic items on the ballot. In his/her haste to get the job done, the PhotoShopper simply made an error in layers and placed the triangle on top of the stamp rather than the other way around. After placing several items on a palate (and I've done it before myself), you can easily get distracted and not see an error like that. It's a simple fix, just bring forward or send backward objects as you want them to appear. In this case, it APPEARS the graphic person just failed to see his/her error and it wasn't caught by anyone else up the food chain.
how do you explain the triangles not actually being triangles though, if they were copy pasted wrong layer triangles they wouldn't have the weird merged outlines like on the "A" and "M" on the top left ballot image example.
Occam's Razor usually isn't the best guide for forensic investigations xD
Hey, you may be right.... I was just offering a different opinion to consider.
the ballot image creator is obviously using a width outline algorithm as you can see any solid that is not white that is above a certain width threshold is left hollow, even the THICC red text is left hollow, along with the little triangle, the big triangle and the signature box.