18 FEB 2018 u/#q786 u/#q787 u/#q788 u/#q789 u/#q790 u/#q791 u/#q792 u/#q793 u/#q794 u/#q795 u/#q796
19 APR 2018 u/#q1179 u/#q1180 u/#q1181 u/#q1182 u/#q1183 u/#q1184 u/#q1185 u/#q1186 u/#q1187 u/#q1188 u/#q1189 u/#q1190 u/#q1191 u/#q1192 u/#q1193 u/#q1194 u/#q1195 u/#q1196 u/#q1197 u/#q1198
18 JUN 2018 u/#q1538 u/#q1539 u/#q1540 u/#q1541 u/#q1542 u/#q1543 u/#q1544 u/#q1545 u/#q1546 u/#q1547 u/#q1548 u/#q1549 u/#q1550 u/#q1551 u/#q1552 u/#q1553 u/#q1554 u/#q1555
08 FEB 2020 u/#q3843 u/#q3844 u/#q3845 u/#q3846 u/#q3847 u/#q3848
08 APR 2020 u/#q3909 u/#q3910 u/#q3911 u/#q3912 u/#q3913 u/#q3914 u/#q3915 u/#q3916 u/#q3917
Pretend that I'm your country cousin who lives on a dirt road in the mountains and doesn't have internet access. Can you spell this out for me? ...or us? Admittedly I haven't been following the Q clock all that closely, so need some help here.
First, Q posts (IMO) were never intended to be taken linearly, besides that the posts tended to coincide linearly with some happenings at the time (Ex: NK posts were relevant when NK was causing issues, but could also point to future times where NK becomes renewed in relevance)
Next, there's a sequence of posts where Q mentioned posts 'On the clock', then the anons started mapping the Q posts to 1 minute = 1 day and started highlighting the days with or without Q posts. Then came the notes to 'wind the clock' and after some back and forth there was an agreement on a specific date that would represent :00 on the clock and would expand from there.
So, no we go from linear posts applied on a circle where drawing a line through the minute would cross multiple days with posts. Which is meant to hold significance when the actual date aligns with that minute marker.
Here's the kicker; just because it aligns implies relevance, but we can't know which YEAR that would apply, except where a post might preclude a friday for example, so if that year the minute mark hits that friday you could safely assume that that post can be disregarded.
I wouldn't worry too much about that, if anything time has proven is that Q posts have little to no predictive value until the 'future proves the post' accurate.
Even though I've probably said it 3 years in a row now, I'm not sure how things can continue even one more year before things really start heating up.
Thank you for that very cogent explanation and the time it took to post it. I have always been "aware" of the clock as it's mentioned regularly around here, I just never dug into it, thinking that predictive tools might be possible, but also knowing that if WE could see the outlines of The Plan, so could the enemy.
....which led me to dismiss any predictions on dates, black hats, etc.
I appreciate your time to explain this.
No problem, even though I probably couldn't add much more detail and be sure that it was accurate.
There are many new faces around (and some of them aren't even shills), so we have to expect to bring some people up to speed. Bonus that you asked like you really wanted to know.
I definitely agree that the extent of date predictions can't be more than 'something is expected' on a particular date, even if we don't know what it is, and could be referring to something that we would have no capacity to learn (Say, a dumb getting cleared, even if the date was correct, we would never be privy to that information).
One theory I had is based on the uncertainty principle. Because we know the 'what' the plan is, that same information fuzzes up the 'when' stuff will occur. Or, the more detail we can get on the 'when' something will occur the less details we can determine on the 'what' it is that will occur at that time.
In general, I'm happy enough to believe that something (in due course) will happen and that it will be Biblical. The when and how and dates are above my paygrade, so... I wait.
IKR - I mean, in 2001 I fully expected that it was hopeless. That we would fall under the NWO and in a few generations would fail due to entropy and that whatever remnant of humanity remained could rebuild. So, when I became aware of Q posts and the evidence of legitimacy, it was nice to know that there's a strong chance in our favor this time around.
You could start by reading the Q books by Dave Hayes.
post 1185 confirms our position on the clock
minute 13
"Midterms are safe" "Watch CA"
I think this is meaning the midterms we will see CA with other stated flip RED!!