https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/World/20211004/3830842.html
Didnt 3 top Australian Leaders resign over last few days..... WWG1WGA
https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/World/20211004/3830842.html
Didnt 3 top Australian Leaders resign over last few days..... WWG1WGA
Back to Research 101. Wikipedia is not a source. It is crowdsourced. Literally anyone can get on it at any time and write whatever they want on it. Wikipedia has been weaponized by Marxist trolls to attack conservative figures and cover up unflattering history of fellow Marxist politicians and activists. Everything is politicized on that website. Literally everything. Why? Because there is a group of professional academic "fact-checkers" who help resolve issues when contradictory information is posted to articles. Articles that become political battlegrounds get edits turned off until the commissars at Wikipedia can come in and define "Truth" which is inevitably the Leftist narrative.
Wikipedia is NOT a source. In fact, in my experience, even their "sources" are barely recognizable as sources of information half the time. The only use of Wikipedia is to determine the Big Tech party line of what you're supposed to know about a topic from their point of view.
True. So that makes wikipedia equally as reliable as the mainstream media.
You mean that objective, not-Soros-controlled website?