You may have heard us discussing various legislation that exists to protect our rights and to preserve our existing legislation, and that this is why the Trudeau has not been able to implement Federal law to pus their agenda. And folks, this is painfully obvious as we are being controlled through very weak legislation and low levels of the government.
We have found a new piece of Federal legislation that is going to knock your socks off - and this may be the KEY to what is holding them back (along with the Canadian Bill of Rights) from creating a national vaxx policy.
It's an obscure piece of legislation called the Statutory Instruments Act, and ya, it's an odd name, but it's a pretty cool Act! And one that we LOVE dearly. And why do we love it so much? Because, freedom lovers, this Act is going to make it almost an impossible task for the Feds to override our rights through Federal legislation.
The purpose of this Act, among other things, is to examine how each piece of Federal legislation is implemented... and the clincher folks... to ENSURE IT DOES NOT TRESPASS ON OUR RIGHTS UNDER THE WONDERFUL CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS.
Despite how things appear, the government does not have a great command over Canada. This is evident as they are implementing policies through provincial and municipal orders, and as we know these cannot trump Federal legislation. There is case law that states Provincial orders cannot override our fundamental rights. It's all a game, one made of smoke and mirrors.
Here is the excerpt from the Act with the provision that preserves our rights under the Bill:
Examination
(2) On receipt by the Clerk of the Privy Council of copies of a proposed regulation pursuant to subsection (1), the Clerk of the Privy Council, in consultation with the Deputy Minister of Justice, shall examine the proposed regulation to ensure that:
-
(a) it is authorized by the statute pursuant to which it is to be made;
-
(b) it does not constitute an unusual or unexpected use of the authority pursuant to which it is to be made;
-
(c) it does not trespass unduly on existing rights and freedoms and is not, in any case, inconsistent with the purposes and provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Bill of Rights; and
-
(d) the form and draftsmanship of the proposed regulation are in accordance with established standards.
We must continue to push on in this battle. Know that the cards have been dealt in our favour. We MUST learn our rights and how to asset them. This is something we have never had to do before, but together, we can do this!
It starts with saying no, and it closes with HERE'S WHY. And this Act is one of the reason why.
#WEGOTTHIS
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/s-22/
(reposting for a friend - C5)
I don't want to be a party pooper, but I immediately focused in on the word 'unduly' in 2c. Any judge ruling on this will focus on the same word. It is problematic in the same way the notwithstanding clause is in the Charter. A judge could easily rule the pandemic rules and implementation of policy does not UNDULY trespass those rights, since big daddy government knows what's best for the kids....
I hope I'm wrong.
Plus there is this to contend with as well. The Quarantine Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Q-1.1/page-1.html
Evidence of the “Pandemic” must be proven by the government to have it hold up in court. It has already been demonstrated that no “evidence” is available.