There really isn't a "coerced" debate. Replace "shot" with "penis" and ask them if requiring her to receive the penis injection or get fired is coercion.
It absolutely, legally, is coercion. You can't remove choice down to " do it or you will be fired" and call it consent. Precedent has established this.
I agree I don’t know how anyone can say this isn’t coercion. I hope she wins millions and this sets precedent and all these other companies mandating the jab get their asses handed to them.
There really isn't a "coerced" debate. Replace "shot" with "penis" and ask them if requiring her to receive the penis injection or get fired is coercion.
It absolutely, legally, is coercion. You can't remove choice down to " do it or you will be fired" and call it consent. Precedent has established this.
I agree I don’t know how anyone can say this isn’t coercion. I hope she wins millions and this sets precedent and all these other companies mandating the jab get their asses handed to them.