My personal favorite part of this ruling is found on the bottom of page 18 and top of pg 19:

"...the Mandate threatens to substantially burden the liberty interests of reluctant individual recipients put to a choice between their job(s) and their jab(s). For the individual petitioners, the loss of Constitional freedoms for even "minimal periods of time...unquestionably constitutes irrevocable injury." Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) (The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.").

I think it is worth reiterating and really explaining once more for the compliant, complicit sheep trolling this site who are plugging their ears and wetting their pants in the back of the room:

"The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, UNQUESTIONABLY constitutes IRREVOCABLE INJURY." (Emphasis mine).

Unquestionably: in a way that is beyond question or doubt; certainly, absolutely, indisputably

Irrevocable: not able to be changed, reversed, or recovered; final

Injury: hurt, damage, or loss sustained AKA the thing that will make these losers pull out their checkbooks to the tune of fines that will allow their abused employees to never work again if they choose and which will also result in the termination (and hopefully much worse consequences) for all individual actors found guilty of these crimes.

Let's see how well they enjoy having their jobs and their livelihoods and even their freedom threatened or lost altogether for noncompliance with our Constitution!

For those who have not already taken the course, please, please do. It is free and my 10 year old was able to complete it with me so the material is universally accessible.

https://online.hillsdale.edu/landing/constitution-101