Graphene and graphene oxide are toxic, and they interfere with a lot of cellular things, that much is well known. But I find this recent focus on graphene and graphene oxide to be a little sketchy.
Look, athletes are not bleeding out or anything. Their whatever vessels were not literally cut. I find that characterization to be rather poor. They got heart attacks, heart problems, heart muscle damage, those kind of things. The spike protein can cause all of that already.
Let's not embrace this stuff unquestioningly and uncritically like the magnetic jab hoopla once upon a time.
we don't know the whole story. But this makes a lot of sense... the faster the blood pumps the more damage is done, hence all the athletes falling like flies. Whether its spike protein or graphene, we don't know.. I don't think we will ever know.
Graphene or its oxide small enough to be almost invisible (== does not have much of color in solution) must be very small. It will mess with cellular machinery. Cross the blood-brain barrier. Literally cut? Really, I've never seen any such talk in nanotech papers on bioactivity. Read or browsed plenty.
Larger sized molecules will produce a colored solution, and that cannot be hidden. Be skeptical.
He makes sense and seems credible in the subject matter. The cuts are microscopic. So some of the clotting would probably be just barely visible to the naked eye with lots of microscopic damage at the same time.
His pregnant wife made that claim on video. I hope its not true either, but I cant see someone as close to him as that being willing to make a deceptive statement (if you keep with the assumption he is still alive) like that following the incident with police.
I didn't see any transcript at the time, but heard that she said he died while in police custody.. something she was unaware of since he was vanished so quickly after the raid and arrest. So if thats wrong, my view is too since its not informed sufficiently.
I think the spike protein can do that just fine.
Graphene and graphene oxide are toxic, and they interfere with a lot of cellular things, that much is well known. But I find this recent focus on graphene and graphene oxide to be a little sketchy.
Look, athletes are not bleeding out or anything. Their whatever vessels were not literally cut. I find that characterization to be rather poor. They got heart attacks, heart problems, heart muscle damage, those kind of things. The spike protein can cause all of that already.
Let's not embrace this stuff unquestioningly and uncritically like the magnetic jab hoopla once upon a time.
we don't know the whole story. But this makes a lot of sense... the faster the blood pumps the more damage is done, hence all the athletes falling like flies. Whether its spike protein or graphene, we don't know.. I don't think we will ever know.
I am a skeptical dinosaur.
Graphene or its oxide small enough to be almost invisible (== does not have much of color in solution) must be very small. It will mess with cellular machinery. Cross the blood-brain barrier. Literally cut? Really, I've never seen any such talk in nanotech papers on bioactivity. Read or browsed plenty.
Larger sized molecules will produce a colored solution, and that cannot be hidden. Be skeptical.
He called it graphene hydroxide, not sure what the difference is.
He makes sense and seems credible in the subject matter. The cuts are microscopic. So some of the clotting would probably be just barely visible to the naked eye with lots of microscopic damage at the same time.
Cuts you cannot see causing clots, nearly undetectable causation… the perfect mass murder.
His pregnant wife made that claim on video. I hope its not true either, but I cant see someone as close to him as that being willing to make a deceptive statement (if you keep with the assumption he is still alive) like that following the incident with police.
I didn't see any transcript at the time, but heard that she said he died while in police custody.. something she was unaware of since he was vanished so quickly after the raid and arrest. So if thats wrong, my view is too since its not informed sufficiently.
Do we really know they killed him?
I believe his wife said they killed him in a video, but I'm not sure. If he was murdered, what he presented should be taken seriously.