Graphene and graphene oxide are toxic, and they interfere with a lot of cellular things, that much is well known. But I find this recent focus on graphene and graphene oxide to be a little sketchy.
Look, athletes are not bleeding out or anything. Their whatever vessels were not literally cut. I find that characterization to be rather poor. They got heart attacks, heart problems, heart muscle damage, those kind of things. The spike protein can cause all of that already.
Let's not embrace this stuff unquestioningly and uncritically like the magnetic jab hoopla once upon a time.
we don't know the whole story. But this makes a lot of sense... the faster the blood pumps the more damage is done, hence all the athletes falling like flies. Whether its spike protein or graphene, we don't know.. I don't think we will ever know.
Graphene or its oxide small enough to be almost invisible (== does not have much of color in solution) must be very small. It will mess with cellular machinery. Cross the blood-brain barrier. Literally cut? Really, I've never seen any such talk in nanotech papers on bioactivity. Read or browsed plenty.
Larger sized molecules will produce a colored solution, and that cannot be hidden. Be skeptical.
I think the spike protein can do that just fine.
Graphene and graphene oxide are toxic, and they interfere with a lot of cellular things, that much is well known. But I find this recent focus on graphene and graphene oxide to be a little sketchy.
Look, athletes are not bleeding out or anything. Their whatever vessels were not literally cut. I find that characterization to be rather poor. They got heart attacks, heart problems, heart muscle damage, those kind of things. The spike protein can cause all of that already.
Let's not embrace this stuff unquestioningly and uncritically like the magnetic jab hoopla once upon a time.
we don't know the whole story. But this makes a lot of sense... the faster the blood pumps the more damage is done, hence all the athletes falling like flies. Whether its spike protein or graphene, we don't know.. I don't think we will ever know.
I am a skeptical dinosaur.
Graphene or its oxide small enough to be almost invisible (== does not have much of color in solution) must be very small. It will mess with cellular machinery. Cross the blood-brain barrier. Literally cut? Really, I've never seen any such talk in nanotech papers on bioactivity. Read or browsed plenty.
Larger sized molecules will produce a colored solution, and that cannot be hidden. Be skeptical.
He called it graphene hydroxide, not sure what the difference is.